Showing posts with label 1. PARENTS FIRST Legislation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 1. PARENTS FIRST Legislation. Show all posts

Friday, June 24, 2011

2011 Legislative Recap on TWO Parental Rights Bills

A revised HB 542 passed the House (240-108) and the Senate (19-5). It does not allow parents to unilaterally opt out of public school courses or programs based upon rights of conscience as approved by the House.

The Senate's revision requires that school districts adopt a policy allowing an exception to specific course material based on a parent’s determination that it's objectionable. However, and this is the troublesome part, the bill does require the district's approval of the parent's alternative materials. Does anyone believe that districts will suddenly work cooperatively to allow parents to opt out, en masse if necessary, replacing objectionable school materials at the parent's own expense, of course?

If the bill is signed by the governor, a number of legislators have agreed to work again next year on this issue to resolve these problems.

Sen. Jim Forsythe would like to clarify that the district should not be allowed to disapprove the parent's alternative materials, only determine whether the use of these materials will enable the child to receive school credit. Many times receiving school credit is unnecessary; other times it may be useful in order to receive a high school diploma. These two cases need to be considered separately.

In the House, Rep. JR Hoell has introduced legislation to work on and resolve this issue. Rep. Laura Jones and Keith Murphy also support parental rights of conscience, along with Rep. Seth Cohn and Mark Warden.

Please support the efforts of these legislators to get this issue resolved next year.

HB 329, an act requiring parental notification before a minor may have an abortion, was vetoed by Governor Lynch. However, his veto was successfully overridden by the House and Senate to become law.

Wednesday, April 13, 2011

HB 542 Ends Discrimination in Public Schools

The Senate should support House Bill 542, which protects a parent's right to control the education of their child. Despite the hype and blatant disinformation shared at the hearing, this bill does not eliminate compulsory attendance. Nor does it require the district to assume any
additional expenses. It simply addresses some very real discrimination that parents currently face in our public schools.

Remember the controversy in Bedford last December when a high school student objected to being required to read an Economics book called "Nickel and Dimed." by Barbara Ehrenreich. This admittedly Marxist book insulted Christians and promoted illegal drug use as well as being critical of American family life. The book was clearly intolerant and bigoted. Instead of having a reasoned and dispassionate discussion about alternatives, when complaints were made, the parents were falsely accused of trying to ban the book. Rather than find a solution, the parents were forced to remove their son from the public school and instruct him at home. HB 542 would have prevented this situation from escalating and given the parents a statute they could reference in their plea to correct the situation.

Other parents have faced similar hurdles when objecting to sex education and health classes. Not every parent favors the distribution of condoms and flavored lubricants to their young children. Yet under existing law parents are unable to opt out of this required course unless they have an appropriate religious affiliation. HB 542 would resolve this discrimination.

No one questions a parent's right to choose a private school over a public education for their child. But what about parents who cannot afford private school, yet have conscientious objections to a public school program or a particular textbook? How are their rights addressed?

The existing appeals process for parents, who object to a public school program or textbook is difficult and time consuming. It's designed to derail any meaningful opposition. Frequently, it's costly and ineffective.

HB 542 was written to address these concerns. It would end socio-economic and religious discrimination and allow any parents to opt out -- at their own expense -- based upon their inalienable rights of conscience. It's more cost effective for parents of limited means to pay for an alternative textbook or program, than paying for the entire cost of a private school, or forgoing a second income in order to home school their child. This bill offers parents real solutions.

The sponsors of HB 542 were working with an attorney in Legislative Services to clarify the expressed concerns of the Senate Education Committee, when the Chairman asked her Committee not to wait for this amendment and vote down the bill.

A parent's right to control the education of his/her child is guaranteed by the Constitution and the NH Republican Party platform as well. The GOP platform clearly states:

"We oppose state interference with parental rights and believe:
  • Only parents can be entrusted to control the education of their children and choose schools that best suit their children's needs.
  • Laws should be implemented to encourage school choice and competition and allow all parents to choose the best public, private, charter or home school program for their children."
Why, when our NH Constitution and the GOP platform are so clear about this issue, is this task so difficult? The reason it is a difficult task is that the Senate listens very closely to the highly paid lobbyists.

During the two hearings (House and Senate), the lobbyists from the NEA-NH, the State Department of Education, the NH School Administrators Association, the NH School Boards Association all opposed this bill. Meanwhile, the public stood united with no dissenters in their support for this legislation. The lobbyists believe that the State's interest in education SUPERSEDES the rights of the parents whenever it suits their convenience. These lobbyists benefit from status quo and live on tax-funded salaries, some earning in excess of $163,000. I only wish the average NH parent could claim that level of income. Parents, however, believe that education should be more than "adequate". They want the best education for their children.

On Wednesday, parents will see how their State Senators feel about their rights. Please consider contacting your State Senator and asking them to overturn the Committee vote support this bill either as drafted or the amendment being drafted by the sponsors.

Rep. JR Hoell (Dunbarton)

Tuesday, March 29, 2011

HB 542: Parental Rights of Conscience Hearing with Senate Committee

On April 5th, Tuesday at 1:30 PM there will be a public hearing in front of the Senate Education Committee in the LOB Room 103.

It's very important that parents attend or contact these committee members and tell them to support parental rights. Click on the senators names to get their phone numbers and email addresses. The lobbyists will be working hard to oppose this bill, so we need lots of parents to remind these legislators that our rights of conscience are inalienable.

EDUCATION
Nancy F. Stiles, Chairman
James R. Forsythe, V Chairman
Sharon M. Carson
Molly M. Kelly
Russell E. Prescott

HB542 -FN
Session Year 2011
Bill Docket
Bill Status
Bill Text
Roll Calls Title: (New Title) prohibiting a school district from requiring that a parent send his or her child to any school or program to which the parent may be conscientiously opposed.
G-Status: SENATE
House Status: PASSED / ADOPTED WITH AMENDMENT
Senate Status: IN COMMITTEE
Next/Last Comm: SENATE EDUCATION
Next/Last Hearing: 04/05/2011 at 01:30 PM LOB 103

1 New Paragraph; Attendance by Pupil. Amend RSA 193:1 by inserting after paragraph IV the following new paragraph:

V. No school district shall compel a parent to send his or her child to any school or program to which he or she may be conscientiously opposed nor shall a school district approve or disapprove a parent’s education program or curriculum.

2 Effective Date. This act shall take effect upon its passage.

Saturday, March 19, 2011

HB 542 Moves to Senate


The NH House voted to pass HB 542 by a vote of 197-148. The bill goes to the Senate where it will get another public hearing. If it’s passed and then signed by the governor, it would recognize parents rights of conscience to oppose any textbook, program or even school. It also restricts the school district from approving or disapproving the parent’s program.


Here’s a copy of the entire bill:


NH RSA 193:1 Duty of Parent; Compulsory Attendance by Pupil.


V. No district shall compel a parent to send his child to any school or program to which he may be conscientiously opposed,


nor shall any district approve or disapprove a parent's education

program or curriculum.


The first section recognizes a parent's inalienable rights of conscience. The second section is taken directly from the current statute on the regulation of private schools, RSA 186:11.


However, it is extremely useful to place these parental rights prominently in statute. It places a flag in the ground, which recognizes parents’ constitutional rights and will prevent parents from back sliding down a slippery slope each year, arguing against the same proposed increases in state regulation.


Many districts have policies to assist parents who might oppose certain school programs or courses. Others don't. This bill would allow parents to argue from a position of authority: theirs, as specified under this proposal. It also recognizes private school parents as well as home schooling parents for their conscientious opposition to public school instruction. This proposal empowers all parents across the board, not just home schoolers. When you contact senators, you need only identify yourself as a parent.


Parents, not the government, know what is best for their children. Parents should have the right to determine what is best for their children. This bill will improve education in New Hampshire by empowering parents to do what they know is best for their children.


The Republican Party Platform promised to uphold the rights of parents. Please ask these Senate Education Committee members to support parental rights under HB 542 as amended.


Contact information for members of the Senate Education Committee is below:

1. Senator Nancy Stiles (republican)- Chair


603-271-6933


Email: nancy.stiles@leg.state.nh.us


2. Senator James Forsythe (republican) - Vice Chair


603-271-3096


Email: james.forsythe@leg.state.nh.us


3. Senator Sharon Carson (republican)


603-271-2674


Email: sharon.carson@leg.state.nh.us


4. Senator Molly Kelly (democrat)

603-271-2166

Email: molly.kelly@leg.state.nh.us


5. Senator Russell Prescott
(republican)

603-271-3074

Email: russell.prescott@leg.state.nh.us


For the most up-to-date information on HB 542, click on the bill's docket.


Wednesday, March 9, 2011

HB 542: Parental Rights of Conscience Supported by Education Committee

The House Education Committee decided that HB 542 "Ought To Pass as Amended" this morning with an 11 to 6 vote.

NH RSA 193:1 Duty of Parent; Compulsory Attendance by Pupil.

V. No district shall compel a parent to send his child to any school
or program to which he may be conscientiously opposed,

nor shall any district approve or disapprove a parent's education
program or curriculum.

Voting in favor of the motion were Reps. Balboni, Ingbretson, Kolodziej, Brosseau,
Greemore, Hill, Hoell, Jones, Rago, Baldasaro, and Boehm

Voting against were Reps. Hutchinson, Fleck, Gile, Shaw, Bouchard, Frazer

There were four new members of the HEC for today's vote. The House Speaker made sure to replace missing HEC members for the vote on this bill. So, please thank the Speaker for his concern about parental rights of conscience.

HB 542 will go to the House floor next week. The House Calendar comes out on Thursday, so we'll have a more definitive schedule later this week.

Please contact your state representatives as soon as possible and ask for their support of HB 542 "as amended" in committee. Those 35 words in blue are the entire bill . It's short and sweet.

Find your representatives:
http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/house/members/memberlookup.aspx

HB 542, as amended, adds nothing new to statute that isn't already in effect via court decisions or current law. The first section recognizes a parent's inalienable rights of conscience. The second section is taken directly from the current statute on the regulation of private schools, RSA 186:11.

However, it is extremely useful to place these parental rights prominently in statute. It places a flag in the ground, which will prevent parents from back sliding down a slippery slope each year, arguing against the same proposed increases in state regulation.

Many districts have policies to assist parents who might oppose certain school programs or courses. Others don't. This bill would allow parents to argue from a position of authority: theirs, as specified under this proposal. It also recognizes private school parents as well as home schooling parents for their conscientious opposition to public school instruction. This proposal empowers all parents across the board.

The Republican House Agenda promised to uphold the rights of parents. Please ask your representatives to support parental rights with HB 542 as amended.

Sunday, February 27, 2011

HB 542: Rep. Cohn's Amendment -- Please Support!

Rep. Seth Cohn, R-Canterbury, has proposed the following amendment:

NH RSA 193:1 Duty of Parent; Compulsory Attendance by Pupil.

V. No district shall compel a parent to send his child to any school
or program to which he may be conscientiously opposed, nor shall
any district approve or disapprove a parent's education program
or curriculum.


This amendment adds nothing new to statute that isn't already in effect via court decisions or the statute for regulating private schools, RSA 186:11. However, it is extremely useful in that it places a marker into statute to prevent parents from sliding back down a slippery slope each year, arguing against the same increases in state regulation.

Support for this amendment to HB 542 would redeem Republicans who promised to uphold the rights of homeschoolers.

Please contact all members of the House Education Committee and ask that they vote HB 542 OTP (ought to pass) with the Cohn amendment.

The committee will vote in executive session on Wednesday, March 9th at 10:15 am in LOB (Legislative Office Building) Room 207.

Tuesday, February 15, 2011

HB 595: Proposed Amendment #2

Amendment to HB 595

Amend the bill by replacing it in its entirety with the following:


AN ACT amending the compulsory school attendance statutes to permit parent-directed instruction programs and repealing the home education statutes.


SPONSORS: Rep. L. Jones, Straf 1; Rep. Manuse, Rock 5; Rep. Cohn, Merr 6; Rep. Baldasaro, Rock 3; Rep. C. Vita, Straf 3; Rep. Accornero, Belk 4; Rep. Avard, Hills 20; Rep. S. Palmer, Hills 6; Rep. Simpson, Belk 1; Sen. White, Dist 9; Sen. Forsythe, Dist 4; Sen. Luther, Dist 12


COMMITTEE: Education

ANALYSIS

This bill:


I. Repeals the home education statute.


II. Permits parent-directed instruction programs.


III. Asserts that it is the natural right of a parent to determine and direct the instruction of his or her child and limits the involvement of the state in parent-directed instruction programs only to cases in which there is probable cause to believe that a parent is not instructing his or her child.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Explanation: Matter added to current law appears in bold italics.

Matter removed from current law appears [in brackets and struckthrough.]

Matter which is either (a) all new or (b) repealed and reenacted appears in regular type.

11-0755

04/05

STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

In the Year of Our Lord Two Thousand Eleven


AN ACT amending the compulsory school attendance statutes to permit parent-directed instruction programs and repealing the home education statutes.


Be it Enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court convened:


1 Statement of Purpose. It is the natural right and duty of parents to determine and direct the instruction of their children for their education. The general court acknowledges that the primary and natural instructors of a child are his or her parents, and the general court guarantees the right and duty of parents to provide for the instruction of their children. Parents shall be free to provide this instruction in the manner and at the location of their choosing, including in their homes or in private schools or in schools recognized or established by their resident school district or by the state or in other places where instruction can be given.


2 Child Protection Act; Definitions. Amend RSA 169-C:3, XIX(b) to read as follows:


(b) Who is without proper parental care or control, subsistence, [education as required by law,] or other care or control necessary for his physical, mental, or emotional health, when it is established that his health has suffered or is very likely to suffer serious impairment; and the deprivation is not due primarily to the lack of financial means of the parents, guardian or custodian; or


3 Truant Officers; Duties. Amend RSA 189:36, I to read as follows:


I. Truant officers shall, when directed by the school board, enforce the laws and regulations relating to truants and children between the ages of 6 and 18 years not attending school or who are not participating in an alternative learning plan under RSA 193:1, I[(h)] (b)(8); and the laws relating to the attendance at school of children between the ages of 6 and 18 years; and shall have authority without a warrant to take and place in school any children found employed contrary to the laws relating to the employment of children, or violating the laws relating to the compulsory attendance at school of children under the age of 18 years, and the laws relating to child labor. No [home school pupil] child in a parent-directed instruction program nor any person between the ages of 6 and 18 who meets any of the requirements of RSA 193:1, I[(c)-(h)] (b)(2)-(8) shall be deemed a truant.


4 School Attendance; Duty of Parents. Amend the section heading of RSA 193:1 and RSA 193:1, I to read as follows:


193:1 Rights and Duties of [Parent] Parents; Compulsory Attendance by Pupil.


I. It is the natural right of parents to determine and direct the instruction of their children. A parent of any child at least 6 years of age and under 18 years of age:


(a) Shall instruct such child or cause such child to be instructed as determined by the parent; or


(b) Shall cause such child to attend the public school to which the child is assigned in the child’s resident district. Such child shall attend the public school to which the child is assigned full time when such school is in session unless:


(1) The child is receiving parent-directed instruction and is therefore exempt from this requirement;


(A) Notification (optional). A parent may notify the superintendent of his or her resident school district or the principal of a nonpublic school of his or her decision to involve his or her child in a parent-directed instruction program pursuant to this section. Such notification shall not be required of a parent, and failure to send such notification shall not be considered probable cause under RSA 193:1(I-a).


(B) A parent who chooses to notify the superintendent of the resident school district or the principle of a nonpublic school under RSA 193:1(I)(b)(1)(A) may submit such notification within 14 days of the date the child is withdrawn from a public or nonpublic school, or moves into the resident school district, or reaches compulsory attendance age pursuant to this section. Notification may include the name, address, and age of each child whose education is being personally directed by the parent pursuant to this chapter. A parent may also send such notification if he or she ends a parent-directed instruction program for any period of time and then subsequently resumes such a program. A parent may choose to enroll a child previously involved in a parent-directed instruction program in a public or private school at any time that any other child may be enrolled.


(C) The superintendent of the resident school district or the principle of a nonpublic school receiving notification pursuant to RSA 193:1(I)(b)(1)(A) and to RSA 193:1(I)(b)(1)(B) shall provide written acknowledgment of the notification within 14 days of receipt of the notification.


(D) Privacy. Records or information maintained by the superintendent of the resident school district or the principal of a nonpublic school under this chapter shall not be public records pursuant to RSA 91-A and shall not be released to any person or agency without the express written consent of the parent.


[(a)] (2) The child is attending a New Hampshire public school outside the district to which the child is assigned or an approved New Hampshire private school for the same time;


[(b) The child is receiving home education pursuant to RSA 193-A and is therefore exempt from this requirement;


(c)] (3) The relevant school district superintendent has excused a child from attendance because the child is physically or mentally unable to attend school, or has been temporarily excused upon the request of the parent for purposes agreed upon by the school authorities and the parent. Such excused absences shall not be permitted if they cause a serious adverse effect upon the student’s educational progress. Students excused for such temporary absences may be claimed as full-time pupils for purposes of calculating state aid under RSA 186-C:18 and adequate education grants under RSA 198:41;


[(d)] (4) The child is attending a public or private school located in another state which has been approved by the state education agency of the state in which the school is located;


[(e)] (5) The pupil has been exempted from attendance pursuant to RSA 193:5;


[(f)] (6) The pupil has successfully completed all requirements for graduation and the school district is prepared to issue a diploma or the pupil has successfully achieved the equivalent of a high school diploma by [either:


(1)] obtaining a GED certificate[; or


(2) Documenting the completion of a home school program at the high school level by submitting a certificate or letter to the department of education];


[(g)] (7) The pupil has been accepted into an accredited postsecondary education program; or


[(h)] (8) The pupil obtains a waiver from the superintendent, which shall only be granted upon proof that the pupil is 16 years of age or older and has an alternative learning plan for obtaining either a high school diploma or its equivalent.


[(1)] (A) Alternative learning plans shall include age-appropriate academic rigor and the flexibility to incorporate the pupil’s interests and manner of learning. These plans may include, but are not limited to, such components or combination of components of extended learning opportunities as independent study, private instruction, performing groups, internships, community service, apprenticeships, and on-line courses.


[(2)] (B) Alternative learning plans shall be developed, and amended if necessary, in consultation with the pupil, a school guidance counselor, the school principal and at least one parent or guardian of the pupil, and submitted to the school district superintendent for approval.


[(3)] (C) If the superintendent does not approve the alternative learning plan, the parent or guardian of the pupil may appeal such decision to the local school board. A parent or guardian may appeal the decision of the local school board to the state board of education consistent with the provisions of RSA 21-N:11, III.


5 Compulsory School Attendance; Definitions. Amend RSA 193:1, III to read as follows:

III. In this section[,]:


(a) “Child” means a child or children of compulsory attendance age who is a resident of New Hampshire.


(b) “Parent” means a parent, guardian, or person having legal custody of a child.


(c) “Parent-directed instruction” means instruction determined and directed by the parent or guardian of a child who is of compulsory school age. Such instruction may also be referred to as “homeschooling.”


6 New Paragraph; School Attendance; Limitations on State, County and Municipal Action. Amend RSA 193:1 by inserting after paragraph 1 the following new paragraph:

I-a. Under no circumstances shall the neglect provisions of RSA 169-C and RSA 169-D apply to a parent involved in parent-directed instruction. Instead, only the following civil procedure shall apply to a parent involved in parent-directed instruction:


(a) Original jurisdiction of any action brought against a parent engaged in parent-directed instruction pursuant to this chapter shall be in the Superior Court in the county of the parent's residence.


(b) The state, a county or any local jurisdiction shall not interfere with the natural right of a parent to instruct his or her child unless the acting jurisdiction has probable cause to believe that a parent involved in a parent-directed instruction program has failed to instruct or cause the child to be instructed.


(c) If there is probable cause to believe that a parent involved in a parent-directed instruction program has failed to instruct or cause the child to be instructed, a local jurisdiction may investigate, after prior notice to the parent, to determine if there is sufficient evidence to proceed against the parent. The Division of Children, Youth and Family Services shall not investigate any case of failure to instruct or cause the child to be instructed. No other state agency shall investigate any case of failure to instruct or cause the child to be instructed. Not more than one jurisdiction shall ever investigate a case of failure to instruct or cause the child to be instructed.


(d) A local jurisdiction shall only proceed against a parent in accordance with the Constitutional provisions for due process and a fair trial, during which the parent shall retain the presumption of innocence.


(e) A local jurisdiction shall not compel a parent to submit evidence to prove his or her innocence, nor shall the local jurisdiction presume such parent has failed to instruct or cause the child to be instructed based on the parent's failure to submit such evidence.


(f) In any action relating to a parent involved in a parent-directed instruction program, no finding or opinion that a parent has failed to instruct or cause the child to be instructed shall issue except upon evidence proven beyond a reasonable doubt.


(g) A parent involved in a parent-directed instruction program who has failed to instruct or cause the child to be instructed may be found guilty only of a civil violation. Under no circumstances shall the state, a county, a local jurisdiction, or any other government official, including but not limited to a court, remove a child from a parent's custody based on an allegation or finding of failure to instruct or cause the child to be instructed or for any other allegation or finding pertaining to a parent-directed instruction program. Only after the procedure in this section has been followed, and a court has found by evidence proven beyond a reasonable doubt, in three separate court proceedings, that a parent has failed to instruct the child or failed to cause the child to be instructed, may the court, as of the third court proceeding, order the child to be returned to a public or nonpublic school, as shall be determined by the parent.


(h) No state agency or local jurisdiction shall have authority to write or enforce rules relative to parent-directed instruction programs.


7 School Attendance; Access to Public School Programs. Amend RSA 193:1-c to read as follows:

193:1-c Access to Public School Programs by Pupils in Nonpublic or [Home Educated Pupils] Parent-Directed Instruction Programs.


I. Pupils in nonpublic or [home educated pupils] parent-directed instruction programs shall have access to curricular courses and cocurricular programs offered by the school district in which the pupil resides. The local school board may adopt a policy regulating participation in curricular courses and cocurricular programs, provided that such policy shall not be more restrictive for [non-public or home educated pupils] pupils in a nonpublic or parent-directed instruction program than the policy governing the school district’s resident pupils. In this section, “cocurricular” shall include those activities which are designed to supplement and enrich regular academic programs of study, provide opportunities for social development, and encourage participation in clubs, athletics, performing groups, and service to school and community. For purposes of allowing access as described in this section, a [“home educated pupil”] pupil in a parent-directed instruction program shall not include any pupil who has graduated from a high school level program [of home education,] or its equivalent, or has attained the age of 21.


II. Nothing in this section shall be construed to require a parent to establish a [home education] parent-directed instruction program which exceeds the provisions of RSA 193:1.


8 School Attendance; Bylaws as to Nonattendance. Amend RSA 193:16 to read as follows:


193:16 Bylaws as to Nonattendance. Districts may make bylaws, not repugnant to law, concerning habitual truants and children between the ages of 6 and 18 years not attending school or who are not participating in an alternative learning plan under RSA 193:1, I[(h)] (b)(8), and to compel the attendance of such children at school; failure to comply with such bylaws shall constitute a violation for each offense.


9 Legislative Youth Advisory Council; Membership. Amend RSA 19-K:2, I-IV to read as follows:


I. The president of the senate shall appoint the following 7 members:


(a) Three youths who are students in secondary schools, who are [home school] students in a parent-directed instruction program as provided in RSA 193:1, I, or who are enrolled in programs that lead to a secondary school diploma, certificate of attendance, or general equivalency diploma.


(b) Three youths who are residents of this state and who are students at postsecondary education institutions located in the state.


(c) One member of the senate.


II. The speaker of the house of representatives shall appoint the following 8 members:


(a) Four youths who are students in secondary schools, who are [home school] students in a parent-directed instruction program as provided in RSA 193:1, I, or who are enrolled in programs that lead to a secondary school diploma, certificate of attendance, or general equivalency diploma.


(b) Three youths who are residents of this state and who are students at postsecondary education institutions located in the state.


(c) One member of the house of representatives.


III. The governor shall appoint the following 3 members:


(a) Two youths who are students in secondary schools, who are [home school] students in a parent-directed instruction program as provided in RSA 193:1, I, or who are enrolled in programs that lead to a secondary school diploma, certificate of attendance, or general equivalency diploma.


(b) One youth who is a resident of this state and who is a student at a postsecondary education institution located in the state.


IV. The secretary of state shall appoint the following 3 members:


(a) Two youths who are students in secondary schools, who are [home school] students in a parent-directed instruction program as provided in RSA 193:1, I, or who are enrolled in programs that lead to a secondary school diploma, certificate of attendance, or general equivalency diploma.


(b) One youth who is a resident of this state and who is a student at a postsecondary education institution located in the state.


10 Special Education; Advisory Committee. Amend RSA 186-C:3-b, II(p) to read as follows:


(p) One individual representing children with disabilities who are [home-schooled] in a parent-directed instruction program as specified in RSA 193:1, I, appointed by the governor.


11 Granite State Scholars Program; Scholar Designation. Amend RSA 188-D:39, II to read as follows:


II. The state board of education shall adopt rules, pursuant to RSA 541-A, relative to establishing the granite state scholar designation in high schools that do not calculate class rank, in non-accredited high schools, and for [home schooled] students in a parent-directed instruction program as provided in RSA 193:1, I.


12 Statewide Education Improvement and Assessment Program; Assessment Required. Amend RSA 193-C:6 to read as follows:


193-C:6 Assessment Required. Each year, a statewide assessment shall be administered in all school districts in the state in grades 3 through 8 and one grade in high school. All public school students in the designated grades shall participate in the assessment, unless such student is exempted, or provided that the commissioner of the department of education may, through an agreement with another state when such state and New Hampshire are parties to an interstate agreement, allow pupils to participate in that state's assessment program as an alternative to the assessment required under this chapter. [Home educated students] Students in a parent-directed instruction program may contact their local school districts if they wish to participate in the statewide assessment. Private schools may contact the department of education to participate in the statewide assessment.


13 Safe School Zones; Definitions. Amend RSA 193-D:1, III to read as follows:


III. “School” means any public or private elementary, secondary, or secondary vocational-technical school in New Hampshire. It shall not include [home schools under RSA 193-A] a personal residence or other space used to conduct a parent-directed instruction program pursuant to RSA 193:1, I.


14 Chartered Public Schools; Establishment and Application. Amend RSA 194-B:3, VIII to read as follows:


VIII. [Home education programs established pursuant to RSA 193-A] A parent-directed instruction program as specified in RSA 193:1, I shall not be eligible to be a chartered public school.


15 School Administrative Units; Superintendent Services. Amend RSA 194-C:4, II(d) to read as follows:


(d) Compliance with laws, regulations, and rules regarding special education, Title IX, the Americans with Disabilities Act, [home education,] minimum standards, student records, sexual harassment, and other matters as may from time to time occur.


16 Cooperative School Districts; Procedure for Formation. Amend RSA 195:18, III(e) to read as follows:


(e) The method of apportioning the operating expenses of the cooperative school district among the several preexisting districts and the time and manner of payment of such shares. [Home education pupils] Students in a parent-directed instruction program who do not receive services from the cooperative school district[, except an evaluation pursuant to RSA 193-A:6, II] shall not be included in the average daily membership relative to apportionment formulas.


17 Cooperative School Districts; Procedure for Formation. Amend RSA 195:18, III(g) to read as follows:


(g) The method of apportioning the capital expenses of the cooperative school district among the several preexisting districts, which need not be the same as the method for apportioning operating expenses, and the time and manner of payment of such shares. Capital expenses shall include the costs of acquiring land and buildings for school purposes, including property owned by a preexisting district; the construction, furnishing and equipping of school buildings and facilities; and the payment of the principal and interest of any indebtedness which is incurred to pay for the same or which is assumed by the cooperative school district. [Home education pupils] Students in a parent-directed instruction program who do not receive services from the cooperative school district[, except an evaluation pursuant to RSA 193-A:6, II,] shall not be included in the average daily membership relative to apportionment formulas.


18 Costs of Capital Outlay and Operation. Amend RSA 195:7, II to read as follows:


II. [Home education pupils] Students in a parent-directed instruction program who do not receive services from the cooperative school district[, except an evaluation pursuant to RSA 193-A:6, II,] shall not be included in the average daily membership relative to apportionment formulas.


19 Repeal. The following law is repealed:


I. RSA 193-A, relative to home education programs.


20 Effective Date. This act shall take effect upon its passage.


Saturday, February 5, 2011

Comparison of 2011 Amended Legislative Proposals

Comparison of 2011 Proposals


Parent-Directed Instruction

HB 595

Home Education

HB 301

Sponsors

(* home schoolers)

*Rep. Laura Jones

*Rep. Andrew Manuse

Rep. Seth Cohn

Rep. Al Baldasaro

Rep. Carol Vita

Rep. Harry Accornero

Rep. Kevin Avard

Rep. Stephen Palmer

Rep. Tyler Simpson

*Rep. Jim Parison

Rep. Paul Mirski

Rep. Charles Sova


Sen. Jim Forsythe

Sen. Ray White

Sen. Jim Luther

Sen. Ray White

Sen. Sharon Carson

Constitutional

Yes

No

Parental duty to instruct child

Recognizes “parental-directed” instruction

State approval required to initiate “home education” program

--------------------------------

Notification & Acknowledgement procedure to obtain approval

Compulsory education

Not required

Equitable

Duty to instruct similar to public and private schools

Required

Inequitable

Exceeds public or private school requirement

Proof of educational progress can be required of parents

Compulsory attendance law

Not applicable to parents instructing their children

Parent-Directed Instruction

No change

Subject listed

Subjects provided to “encourage” instruction as designated in NH Const. Pt. II Art. 83, not to restrict parents to any particular curriculum or methodology.

It provides reassurance that parents understand the broad scope of their undertaking.

Subjects required: reading, writing and mathematics.

Home Education law

Repeals

Amends

Due Process

Innocent until proven guilty

Requires “affirmative defense” compromising due process

--------------------------------

Parent is guilty until proven innocent

Inequitable requirements

None

Parents held to a higher standard than public or private school teachers, including criminal prosecution

--------------------------------

Requires “affirmative defense”; parent is guilty until proven innocent

--------------------------------

Specifies ways to demonstrate “progress towards literacy and self-sufficiency commensurate with the child’s age or ability”:

--------------------------------

1. 15th percentile on standardized achievement test

--------------------------------

2. Letter from “credentialed” teacher

--------------------------------

3. Educational materials

--------------------------------

4. Other relevant evidence

Jurisdiction

Superior Court

Superior Court implied by repeated use of the term “prosecution,” which most commonly is used in criminal law


Civil law

Criminal law

Burden of Proof

Highest standard:

Beyond a Reasonable Doubt

Reasonably close to 100%

None specified

Discovery


Parents have to provide their affirmative defense in advance of the proceedings

Charges

Violation

Violation, after two warnings

Fines

None

Up to $250 for 1st offense;

Up to $1000 for 2nd offense

Termination of program

Failure to instruct results in termination and parent chooses public or private school alternative.

Never terminated; without judicial remedy additional charges may be added to protect the child, such as “Endangerment” or “Neglect

Endangering the Welfare of a Child or Incompetent

Not applicable under civil law.

Applicable under criminal prosecution for “failure to educate” or

“knowingly” violates a provision in the law, such as “notification”

--------------------------------

Any curriculum that doesn’t meet state standards can be construed as “knowingly” failing to provide an education. A curriculum establishes intent; a lack of curriculum establishes criminal intent.

--------------------------------

Unschoolers will need to remain underground.

Truancy

Exempt

Exempt

Child Protection:

Educational neglect

Exempt

Exempt, but charges may be used to find judicial remedy

Privacy

No need to disclose private information

Explicit privacy, which is moot under “affirmative defense”

DOE Rulemaking

Allows

Prevents district misinterpretation and rule by court decree

Eliminated

Will result In increased litigation and require more frequent legislative remedy




Statement of Purpose

It is the natural right and duty of parents to determine and direct the instruction of their children for their education.

It is the natural and fundamental right and duty of parents to determine and direct the education of their children.


The general court acknowledges that the primary and natural instructor of a child is the parents, and the general court guarantees the right and duty of parents to provide for the instruction of their children.

The general court acknowledges that the primary and natural educator of a child is the family, and the general court respects the inalienable right and duty of parents to provide for the education of their children.


Parents shall be free to provide this instruction in the manner and at the location of their choosing, including their homes or in private schools or in schools recognized or established by their resident school district or by the state or in other places where instruction can be given.

Parents shall be free to provide this education in the manner and at the location of their choosing including their homes or in private schools or in schools recognized or established by their resident school district or by the state.

Unschoolers

And Learning Disabled Children

No problem

Unless parents can “prove their innocence,” they are guilty of a criminal offense.

Will need to remain underground

Underground Families

No Problem

Unless parents can “prove their innocence,” they are guilty of a criminal offense.

Will need to remain underground.